Misconception: Men are allowed to have concubines or sex slaves
Background: Concubinage may be defined as the more or less permanent cohabitation (outside the marriage bond) of a man with a woman or women, whose position would be that of secondary wives, women bought, acquired by gift, captured in war, or domestic slaves.
And whoever of you cannot afford to marry the
independent believing women, then from those committed to you by oath
of the believing maidens. God is more aware of your faith, you are to
each other (i.e. equal)*. You shall marry
them with the permission of their guardians and give them their dowries
in kindness; they should be chaste not those who commit immorality and
not those who take secret lovers. Then when they become
protected/married, then any of them who comes with lewdness shall have
half the punishment of what is for the independent women. This is for
those who fear hardship from among you. But if you are patient it is
better for you, and God is Forgiver, Merciful. [4:25]
*see 3:195 in which this exact phrase is also used, emphasising equality amongst genders in terms of faith and good deeds.
This passage lays down in an
unequivocal manner that sexual relations with female slaves should only
be permitted on the basis of marriage, and that in this respect there
is no difference between them and free/independent women; consequently,
concubinage is ruled out. Also see 5:5.
Also see the misconception 'Islam and The Quran promotes slavery'.
- click to return to homepage
READ - click to look up verse references